House of Lords
CrossbenchLord Stevens of Birmingham's full title is The Lord Stevens of Birmingham. His name is Simon Laurence Stevens, and he is a current member of the House of Lords.
Overall, across health & social care this Parliament
Alive and kicking!
Ranks 215th of 1273 MPs and peers who have spoken on health or care this Parliament — top 17%. 42 contributions since 2024-07-25.
Lord Stevens of Birmingham has primarily engaged with health and social care through 40 debate speeches, with substantial contributions to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill focused on assisted dying safeguards, particularly conscience protections for healthcare professionals and institutional opt-outs for hospices. He has also contributed to debates on cancer outcomes and armed forces health provision, drawing on his roles as chair of Cancer Research UK and the Armed Forces Parliamentary Trust. His interventions demonstrate sustained engagement with end-of-life care policy and cross-border legislative implications, particularly regarding Scotland and Wales.
Generated from their own Hansard record, below
“…It provides specialist mental health services for veterans. It has been great to see its progress since then. The Bill is now expanding beyond health, education and housing to bring in scope a wider range of public services for the Armed Forces covenant. I will just raise two questions for the Minister on Clause 2.”
Armed Forces Bill · 2026-07-06 · Read on Hansard ↗
“…I declare my interests as chair of Cancer Research UK and chair of King’s College London’s council. Cancer Research UK has a proud tradition of supporting research in the UK as well as internationally. Some eight out of 10 medicines that NHS cancer patients use were either developed by or with Cancer Research UK.”
Cancer Outcomes in the UK · 2026-04-21 · Read on Hansard ↗
“I think what follows from that is that the noble and learned Lord is accepting the position that hospices will not be in a position to restrict their employees from participating in assisted dying, if they are doing that somewhere other than in the hospice.”
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill · 2026-03-27 · Read on Hansard ↗
“…To clarify: he is saying that Clause 31(8)(b) would not apply in hospices; in other words, as drafted, the Bill would prevent a hospice as an employer from restricting doctors who were working for that hospice from also participating in assisted dying.”
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill · 2026-03-27 ·
“I will be equivalently concise. It is important to connect Amendment 657, which specifies that assisted dying “is not to be regarded as medical treatment”, with our debate on the broader conscience protections that the Bill needs to include.”
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill · 2026-03-27 · Read on Hansard ↗
“…The question, just to clarify, is: is he saying that assisted dying is deemed to be a treatment? Nevertheless, his Bill overrides the duties on a doctor affirmed by the Supreme Court in July 2023 in the McCulloch case.…”
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill · 2026-03-27 · Read on Hansard ↗
Contributions reproduced under the Open Parliament Licence.